Original article | International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education 2022, Vol. 1(1) 19-35

Literature Review on The Use of Virtual Reality in Special Education: Current Situation and Opportunities

Ümit Demir

pp. 19 - 35   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijcae.2022.499.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2211-28-0006.R1

Published online: December 29, 2022  |   Number of Views: 28  |  Number of Download: 310


Abstract

The development of many new technologies, especially virtual reality, provides opportunities for their effective use in education. The effective use of these technological developments in education can offer different opportunities for students and trainers: It is thought that with the increase of research and studies on the use of these opportunities, both social awareness and effective use of these tools have increased. In the current literature review, it has been observed that research on the use of virtual reality applications in special education are extremely limited. This research, carried out in this context, was carried out to reveal the current state of special education in our country and internationally in special education. In this study, the literature review, one of the descriptive research methods, was used. Within the scope of the research, it is aimed to reveal the problems experienced in Turkey and future studies by analysing the studies carried out for private education at the national and international levels. Although virtual reality can offer great opportunities for the academic and social development of students with its ability to appeal to many different senses, it was found in literature review that the software made for special education and the research conducted to determine the effectiveness level of this software were extremely limited. As a result, this study is expected to be a guide in the studies on the virtual reality use for special education.

Keywords: Special Education, Technology use in Education, Virtual Reality


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Demir, U. (2022). Literature Review on The Use of Virtual Reality in Special Education: Current Situation and Opportunities . International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education, 1(1), 19-35. doi: 10.29329/ijcae.2022.499.2

Harvard
Demir, U. (2022). Literature Review on The Use of Virtual Reality in Special Education: Current Situation and Opportunities . International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education, 1(1), pp. 19-35.

Chicago 16th edition
Demir, Umit (2022). "Literature Review on The Use of Virtual Reality in Special Education: Current Situation and Opportunities ". International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education 1 (1):19-35. doi:10.29329/ijcae.2022.499.2.

References
  1. Avcıoğlu, H. (2013). Effectiveness of video modeling in training students with intellectual disabilities to greet people when they meet. JESTP, 13(1), 466-477. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aykora, Ü. E., Tekin, A., Aykora, D., Tekin, G., Gündoğdu, E. K., Çalişir, M., & Duyan, M. (2019). The effect of sports virtual reality applications applied to children with moderate intellectual disabilities on the development of some force parameters. TURAN: Center for Strategic Studies, 11(42), 196-202. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayres, K. M., Langone, J., Boon, R. T., & Norman, A. (2006). Computer-based instruction for purchasing skills. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 41(3), 253. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bacca, J., Baldiris:, Fabregat, R., & Graf: (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications.  ET&S, 17(4), 133–149. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baz, F. Ç. (2016). Evaluation of FATİH project in terms of technique, hardware, and content. Electronic Journal of Gumushane University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(15), 196-209. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bilasa, P., & Taşpınar, M. (2017). Identification of key competencies within the scope of lifelong learning: A situation analysis for Turkey.  Journal of National Education, 46(215), 129-144. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boser, K., Goodwin, M. S. & Abowd, G. (2013). Technology tools for students with autism.  Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.  [Google Scholar]
  8. Bozkuş, K., & Karacabey, M. F. (2019). The Use of Information Technologies in Education with the FATİH Project: How Far Have Come Taken?. Education as You Live, 33(1), 17-32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Branham, R. S., Collins, B. C., Schuster, J. W., & Kleinert, H. (1999). Teaching community skills to students with moderate disabilities: Comparing combined techniques of classroom simulation, videotape modeling, and community-based instruction.  Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities,34(2), 170-181. [Google Scholar]
  10. Browder, D. M., & Bambara, L. M. (2000). Home and community. NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  11. Burcroff, T. L., Radogna, D. M., & Wright, E. H. (2003). Community forays: Addressing students' functional skills in inclusive settings.  TEC, 35(5), 52-57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Carrino, F., Cherix, R., Omar, A. K., Mugellini, E., & Wunderle, D. (2019). Bus simulator in virtual reality for young adults with intellectual disabilities. 4th Gamification ve Serious Games Symposium.  HE-Arc, HES-SO. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Y., Chiang, H. C., Ye, J., & Cheng, L. H. (2010). Enhancing empathy instruction using a colla-borative virtual learning environment for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Computers ve Education, 55(4), 1449-1458. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng, Y., & Ye, J. (2010). Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment–The pilot study. Computers ve Education, 54(4), 1068-1077. [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues.  The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Çağlar, S. (2012). Right of accessibility for persons with disabilities and accessibility in Turkey. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law, 61(2), 541-598. [Google Scholar]
  17. Çavaş, B., Çavaş P. H., & Can, B. T. (2004). Virtual reality in education. TOJET, 3(4), 110-116. [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller, H. D. (2010). The effectiveness of the strategy of being a model with video in the teaching of hotel housekeeping skills to individuals with intellectual disabilities (Master's Thesis).  Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskisehir. [Google Scholar]
  19. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers ve Education, 68, 586-596. [Google Scholar]
  20. DiPipi-Hoy, C., & Jitendra, A. (2004). A parent-delivered intervention to teach purchasing skills to young adults with disabilities. JSE, 38(3), 144-157. [Google Scholar]
  21. Education Reform Initiative (2017). (https:www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/egitim-izleme-raporu-2015-16/ ) Last Access Date :24/10/2019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ergenekon, Y. (2012). Teaching Basic First-Aid Skills against Home Accidents to Children with Autism through Video Modeling. JESTP, 12(4), 2759-2766. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferhat: (2016). The reality of the digital world, the virtuality of the real world is virtual reality as a digital media product. TRT Academy Journal, 1(2), 724-746. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gough, D., Oliver, & Thomas, J. (2017).  An introduction to systematic reviews.  Sage. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gökdaş, İ., & Kayri, M. (2005). Problems in terms of e-learning and turkey, solution suggestions. Journal of Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education, 2(2), 1-20. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gülsöz, T. (2014). The effectiveness of teaching the ability to prepare and present cold drinks to students with high-functioning autism with a video model (Master's thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  27. Halisküçük, E. S., & Tekinarslan, İ. Ç. (2007). The effectiveness of being a model with video in teaching pasta cooking skills to students with intellectual disabilities. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 113-127. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamill, L. B. & Everington, C.  (2002). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: An applied approach for inclusive environments. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris, K., & Reid, D. (2005). The influence of virtual reality play on children's motivation. CJO, 72(1), 21-29. [Google Scholar]
  30. Holley, D., Hobbs, M., & Menown, C. (2016). The augmented library: Motivating STEM students. Networks, 19, 77-84. [Google Scholar]
  31. Josman, N., Ben-Chaim, H. M., Friedrich:, & Weiss, P. L. (2008). Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. IJHD, 7(1), 49-56. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A., & Glück, J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine: A Decade of VR, 3, 65-76. [Google Scholar]
  33. Karimi, H. A., Dias, M. B., Pearlman, J., & Zimmerman, G. J. (2014). Wayfinding and navigation for people with disabilities using social navigation networks. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Collaborative Computing, 1, 1–13.  [Google Scholar]
  34. Kayabaşı, Y. (2005). Virtual reality and its use for educational purposes. TOJET, 4, 151-158. [Google Scholar]
  35. Klein, P. S., & Arieli, M. (1997). Mediated learning and its application to the enhancement of mathematical abilities in children with Down Syndrome. JLD, 1, 299-320. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kluth, P. (2000). Community-referenced learning and the inclusive classroom. RASE, 21(1), 19-26. [Google Scholar]
  37. Komşul, M. Z. (2012). The use of virtual reality technology in the education of children with intellectual disabilities and the development of an exemplary application (Master's Thesis).  Trakya University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Edirne.  [Google Scholar]
  38. Krichenbauer, M., Yamamoto, G., Taketom, T., Sandor, C., & Kato, H. (2017). Augmented reality versus virtual reality for 3d object manipulation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 24(2), 1038-1048. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kurtoglu, S., Tekinarslan, E., & Tekinarslan, I. C. (2017). Effectiveness of computer-aided video instruction in teaching individuals with intellectual disabilities the ability to withdraw money from a cash machine. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 18(02), 185-208. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee:, Park, K., Lee, J., & Kim, K. (2017). User study of VR basic controller and data glove as hand gesture inputs in VR games. International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Langone, J. (2002). Computer-based video instruction to teach persons with moderate intellectual disabilities to read grocery aisle signs and locate items. JSE, 35(4), 224-240. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mechling, L. C., & Gast, D. L. (2003). Multi-media instruction to teach grocery word associations and store location: A study of generalization.  Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 62-76. [Google Scholar]
  43. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers ve Graphics, 34(1), 77-91. [Google Scholar]
  44. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752-761. [Google Scholar]
  45. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA, 13(2), 469-486. [Google Scholar]
  46. M.E.B. (2017). National Education Statistics Formal Education. Publications. (https:sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/201709/08151328_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2016_2017.pdf)Last Access Date :30/01/2020 [Google Scholar]
  47. M.E.B. (2019). National Education Statistics Formal Education. Publications. (https:sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/201909/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2018_2019.pdf)Last Access Date :30/01/2020 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mitchell, P., Parsons,  & Leonard, A. (2007). Using virtual environments for teaching social understanding to 6 adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders. JADD, 37(3), 589-600. [Google Scholar]
  49. Morse, T. E., & Schuster, J. W. (2000). Teaching elementary students with moderate intellectual disabilities how to shop for groceries. ECX, 66(2), 273-288. [Google Scholar]
  50. Öncül, N., & Özkan, Y. (2010). Teaching daily living skills to adults with moderate and severe mental disabilities using video modeling. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 143-156. [Google Scholar]
  51. Passig, D. (2009). Improving the sequential time perception of teenagers with mild to moderate mental retardation with 3D immersive virtual reality (IVR). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(3), 263-280. [Google Scholar]
  52. Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change.  Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 164. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sani Bozkurt, S. (2011).  Effectiveness and efficiency of the video model in which peer and adult models are used in the teaching of role-playing skills to children with autism (Master's Thesis). Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  54. Self, T., Scudder, R. R., Weheba, G., ve Crumrine, D. (2007). A virtual approach to teaching safety skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. eTOC, 27(3), 242-253. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sezgin, S. (2016). Gamification of learning and teaching: game-based methods and strategies for study and training.  Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 2(1), 187-197. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sezgin: (2019). Wearable technologies in education: Opportunities and trends.  Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University  Education Faculty, 1(40), 415-18. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shin, D. H. (2017). The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: Technological and affective affordances in virtual reality.  Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1826-1836. [Google Scholar]
  58. Smith, C. C., Cihak, D. F., Kim, B., McMahon, D. D., & Wright, R. (2017). Examining augmented reality to improve navigation skills in postsecondary students with intellectual disabilities. JOSET, 32(1), 3-11. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sotiriou:, & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme.  ASL, 1(1), 114-122. [Google Scholar]
  60. Taber, T. A., Alberto, P. A., Seltzer, A., & Hughes, M. (2003). Obtaining assistance when lost in the community using cell phones. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe. Disabilities, 28(3), 105-116. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dessert, A. (2018). Some cognitive characteristics that influence learning in online multiple learning environments and their relationship to academic success (Master's Thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tepe, T., Kaleci, D., & Tüzün, H. (2016). New trends in educational technologies: virtual reality applications. 10th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium.  [Google Scholar]
  63. Wright, T., & Wolery, M. (2011). The effects of instructional interventions related to street crossing and individuals with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1455-1463.  [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, F., Duh, H. B. L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008, September). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. In 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (pp. 193-202). IEEE. [Google Scholar]