Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education 2025, Vol. 4(2) 115-128
pp. 115 - 128 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijcae.2025.1406.3
Publish Date: December 31, 2025 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
This opinion paper discusses artificial intelligence (AI) within the historical course of theories of learning and the intersections of pedagogy, technology, and policy. Building on the legacy of behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and critical pedagogy, AI is interrogated not only as a technical tool but also as a transformative force that conceptualizes of educational thought. Starting with a vignette invites readers to analytically question whether AI represents a continuity of earlier patterns or a paradigmatic disagreement, and whether it positions learners as empowered mediators or as datafied objects within algorithmic systems. The study highlights that the future of learning depends on balancing two forces: the historical needs of education and the new technical possibilities created by AI. It argues that AI’s strengths—such as personalization, adaptability, and creativity—should be combined with education’s long-term commitments to equity, diversity, and democracy.The contribution lies in incorporating theoretical reflection with narrative pedagogy, offering a background for educators to involve with AI not merely as a technical phenomenon but as a socio-political and epistemological challenge restructuring education in the 21st century.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, learning theories, behaviorism, constructivism, critical pedagogy
APA 7th edition
Yildiz, S.B.Y., & Erbek, N. (2025). AI and the Evolution of Learning Theories: From Historical Paradigms to Emerging Models. International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education, 4(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijcae.2025.1406.3
Harvard
Yildiz, S. and Erbek, N. (2025). AI and the Evolution of Learning Theories: From Historical Paradigms to Emerging Models. International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education, 4(2), pp. 115-128.
Chicago 16th edition
Yildiz, Seval Bircan Yilmaz and Nursen Erbek (2025). "AI and the Evolution of Learning Theories: From Historical Paradigms to Emerging Models". International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education 4 (2):115-128. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijcae.2025.1406.3
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Buldaç, M. (2024). Deneysel tasarım sürecinde yapay zekâ araçlarının kullanımı: İç mimarlık eğitiminde bir ders modeli çıktıları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sanat & Tasarım Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1602366
Columbia University. (2025). AI literacy is imperative for classroom success. Teachers College, Columbia University. https://www.tc.columbia.edu/articles/2025/july/ai-literacy-is-imperative-for-classroom-success/
Çöpgeven, N. S., Özkaya, H., & Aydın, S. (2023). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede yapay zekâ destekli oyunlaştırma. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 386-407. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1203700
Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Eskici, G. Y., Özdemir, N., & Öztürk, M. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin robotik kodlama eğitimi sürecinde şema gelişimi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(2), 234–250.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Friedman, A. (2025, August 18). College students have already changed forever. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/08/ai-college-class-of-2026/683901/
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Gültekin, M., & Burak, D. (2019). Türkiye’de uyarlanabilir öğrenme yaklaşımı kapsamında yapılan tezler üzerine bir içerik analizi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(2), 438-462.
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Holstein, K. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
New York Post. (2025, June 25). Educators warn that AI shortcuts are already making kids lazy. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2025/06/25/tech/educators-warn-that-ai-shortcuts-are-already-making-kids-lazy/
OECD. (2021). AI in education: Challenges and opportunities. OECD Publishing.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson.
Özbay, Ö., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2023). Artırılmış gerçeklikle beraber özetleme stratejisi kullanmanın öğrencilerin bilişsel yük ve başarısına etkisi. TRT Akademi. 8(17), 144-173. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1208221
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Sanal, S. Ö., Akçay, A., Çiçek Tutulmaz, M., & Erdem, M. (2019). Application of learning theories in online instructional environments and materials: A study for developing a set of criteria. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 707-732. https://doi.org/10.14686/BUEFAD.528904
Sarica, S. (2023). Yapay zekâ uygulamalarının deneysel tasarım atölyesi derslerine entegrasyonu: Öğrenci bakış açısıyla değerlendirme. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 11(158), 358-388. https://doi.org/10.29228/asos.73511
Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
The Guardian. (2024, October 4). Estonia eschews phone bans in schools and takes leap into AI. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/04/estonia-schools-ai-phones
Thompson, D. (2025, August 12). The AI takeover of education is just getting started. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/08/ai-takeover-education-chatgpt/683840/
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. Macmillan.
TIME. (2025, July 30). The AI industry is funding a massive AI training initiative for teachers. TIME Magazine. https://time.com/7031871/ai-teacher-training-initiative/
Turkaya, A., & Özdemir, E. B. (2024). Yapay zekâ teknolojileri kullanımının ön lisans öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerine etkisi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi. 7(4), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1486583
U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Guidance on artificial intelligence in education. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-issues-guidance-artificial-intelligence-use
Ünsal, H. (2024). Yapay zekâ: Kuram tabanlı bir analiz. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2024.10.03.003
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428
Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in higher education: Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811
Yavuzalp, N., & Gürol, M. (2017). E-öğrenme ortamında kullanılan öğrenme stillerinin web kullanım madenciliği ile analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 987-1015. https://doi.org/10.17240/AIBUEFD.2017.17.30227-326611
Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R., & Aydın, M. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alanında lisansüstü eğitimini sürdüren öğrencilerin yapay zekâ hakkındaki görüşleri. Asya Studies, 8(27), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1406649
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. In W. Longhofer & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired: New connections to classical and contemporary perspectives (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609