Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Contemporary Approaches in Education Volume 5 (2026)
pp. 1 - 12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijcae.2026.1476.1
Publish Date: September 25, 2026 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the thematic structure and research trends of studies on psychological resilience in early childhood through a bibliometric approach. For this purpose, studies indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database were analyzed based on keyword co-occurrence analysis. In line with the inclusion criteria, a total of 58 articles were included in the analysis. A bibliometric science mapping approach was adopted, and VOSviewer software was used during the analysis process. The findings reveal that research on psychological resilience in early childhood is structured around five main thematic clusters. These clusters were identified as adverse childhood experiences and protective factors, resilience–stress–trauma processes, adolescence and psychological outcomes, mental health and social support systems, and child-focused studies. The network structure indicates that the concept of “resilience” occupies a central position in the field and is strongly connected to both risk factors and protective mechanisms. Temporal analysis findings suggest that earlier studies predominantly focused on risk and trauma, whereas more recent research has increasingly emphasized mental health, social support, and positive developmental experiences. The density analysis further demonstrates that resilience serves as the primary focal point in the literature, around which various thematic domains are organized. In conclusion, research on psychological resilience in early childhood has evolved toward a more comprehensive and developmentally oriented perspective over time. Accordingly, future studies are recommended to place greater emphasis on protective factors and intervention-based approaches.
Keywords: Resilience, Early Childhood, Bibliometric Analysis, Vosviewer
| How to Cite this Article? |
|---|
|
APA 7th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
| References |
|---|
|
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 Chen, H., Hong, Q., Xu, J., Liu, F., Wen, Y., & Gu, X. (2021). Resilience coping in preschool children: The role of emotional ability, age, and gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), Article 5027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18095027 Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 Ernst, J., Juckett, H., & Sobel, D. (2021). Comparing the impact of nature, blended, and traditional preschools on children’s resilience: Some nature may be better than none. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 724340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724340 Jeon, L., Buettner, C. K., & Grant, A. A. (2018). Early childhood teachers’ psychological well-being: Exploring potential predictors of depression, stress, and emotional exhaustion. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1341806 Jeon, L., Buettner, C. K., & Grant, A. A. (2021). Early childhood teachers’ psychological well-being: Exploring potential predictors of teacher-child relationships. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.02.002 Lipscomb, S. T., Hatfield, B., Goka-Dubose, E., Lewis, H., & Fisher, P. A. (2021). Impacts of Roots of Resilience professional development for early childhood teachers on young children’s protective factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.02.002 Masten, A. S., Lucke, C. M., Nelson, K. M., & Stallworthy, I. C. (2021). Resilience in development and psychopathology: Multisystem perspectives. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-120307 Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660 Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000227 Ungar, M. (2021). Multisystemic resilience: Adaptation and transformation in contexts of change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.001.0001 Ungar, M., & Theron, L. (2020). Resilience and mental health: How multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(5), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1 van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 |